Tuesday, 25 March 2014

Was fundamental analysis redundant in the period during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC)?



Assignment Details

Question: 

“Was fundamental analysis redundant in the period during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC)? Discuss Critically”

Some important instructions to be followed:

·         You don't have to write about Technical analysis.

·         Paper should be formatted in Harvard referencing Style. There should be proper intext citations. References should be in Alphabetical order.

·         There need to be at least 12 references used in this essay. Journal articles only can be quoted and used in the essay for references. In addition anything from a company (FA) or from any charting website as long as it is referenced. Any information from a national bank, for example IMF, OECD or any central bank could be used. Text books, magazines, newspapers, blogs, Moocs etc are not allowed in references.

·         Use I as first person when testing the fundamental Like, I have chosen this company (the same as in sample).

·         I need one company from Australian Stock Exchange like, Telstra, ANZ Bank, Quants to be used in this essay to analyse the question. The period is to be used from 2007-2012. You need to use company to analyse the essay question. It is very important.

·         When you put the chart analyse it, such as done in the sample.

·         It is not allowed to talk about crisis at all. It is okey to talk about Fundamental analysis a little bit, then the rest is testing whether the fundamental analysis work during that period. As we all know most likely it doesn't work during crisis. (Like the sample).

·         I have given grading critera sheet that the teacher will mark us on. Please follow it.

·         It need to be 1500 words minimum.


:  Assessment  One :

: Research, analyse and evaluate information relevant to a problem or issue in order to suggest solutions and/or recommendations

Grade
7
6
5
4
<4
Identify the problem within the discipline framework
Demonstrates thorough understanding of the scope and scale of the problem(s) within the given context (the company, corporation, etc)

’able to relate this particular example to problematic issues in the context of the discipline’ 

Demonstrates awareness of the scope and scale of the problem(s) within the given context (the company, corporation, etc)


Is able to identify/name the problem(s) and give indications of the outcomes /implications that make it problematic.


Is able to identify/name the problem(s)

Possibly also…’able to say why it is a problem in the context of the discipline’ 
Does not identify the problem(s) OR identification is insufficient.
Analyse the problem using the appropriate theoretical framework(s) of the discipline
Covers all aspects of the analysis, always trying to drill down and give depth; uses all elements of the underpinning theoretical framework relevant to the discipline.

Covers all aspects of the analysis, showing some depth in places; uses all elements of the underpinning theoretical framework relevant to the discipline.

Gives an overall analysis using main elements of the underpinning theoretical framework relevant to the discipline.
Gives a partial analysis using main elements of the underpinning theoretical framework relevant to the discipline.
Analysis demonstrates little or no understanding of the underpinning theoretical framework relevant to the discipline.
Explore the range of methodologies; select and use the/those most appropriate
There is thorough exploration of the range of available methodologies (in the discipline and/or other related disciplines); justification for the selection and application is systematic and detailed.
Explores the range of available methodologies (in the discipline and/or other related disciplines); selection is justified and the application is explained.
Identifies/names range of available methodologies (in the discipline and/or other related disciplines); selects appropriately with some justification for choice; main features of application are indicated.
Identifies/names some of the range of available methodologies (in the discipline and/or other related disciplines); selects appropriately though reasons for this are either absent or not fully explained; some application is indicated.

The analysis does not consider a range of methodologies OR the methodology selected and used is not the most appropriate.  
Provide solution(s) and/or recommendation(s) that follow coherently from the research and analysis carried out
Provides solutions and/or recommendations, and choices are prioritised; links to foregoing research and analysis are coherent and well integrated into the text and use of examples to clearly bring the theory to practise. 


Provides solutions and/or recommendations, with some prioritisation of choice; there are coherent links to foregoing research and analysis. Some basic use of examples to bring the theory to practise.

Provides a range of solutions and/or recommendations; links to foregoing research and analysis show some coherence.  Little use of examples to bring the theory to practise.

Provides some solutions and/or recommendations; there is some linking to the foregoing  research and analysis  No evidence of examples to practise


Demonstrates little or no solution(s) and/or recommendation(s) OR the solution and/or recommendations provided are not informed by research and analysis; significant limitations apparent. No evidence to bring theory to practise.



Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted.....

No comments:

Post a Comment