Assignment
Details
Question:
“Was
fundamental analysis redundant in the period during the Global Financial Crisis
(GFC)? Discuss Critically”
Some important instructions to be followed:
Some important instructions to be followed:
·
You don't have to write about
Technical analysis.
·
Paper should be formatted in Harvard
referencing Style. There should be proper intext citations. References should
be in Alphabetical order.
·
There need to be at least 12
references used in this essay. Journal articles only can be quoted and used in
the essay for references. In addition anything from a company (FA) or from any
charting website as long as it is referenced. Any information from a national
bank, for example IMF, OECD or any central bank could be used. Text books,
magazines, newspapers, blogs, Moocs etc are not allowed in references.
·
Use I as first person when
testing the fundamental Like, I have chosen this company (the same as in sample).
·
I need one company from
Australian Stock Exchange like, Telstra, ANZ Bank, Quants to be used in this
essay to analyse the question. The period is to be used from 2007-2012. You
need to use company to analyse the essay question. It is very important.
·
When you put the chart analyse
it, such as done in the sample.
·
It is not allowed to talk about
crisis at all. It is okey to talk about Fundamental analysis a little bit, then
the rest is testing whether the fundamental analysis work during that period. As
we all know most likely it doesn't work during crisis. (Like the sample).
·
I have given grading critera
sheet that the teacher will mark us on. Please follow it.
·
It need to be 1500 words
minimum.
: Research,
analyse and evaluate information relevant to a problem or issue in order to
suggest solutions and/or recommendations
|
Grade
|
7
|
6
|
5
|
4
|
<4
|
|
Identify the problem
within the discipline framework
|
Demonstrates thorough understanding of the scope and scale of the problem(s)
within the given context (the company, corporation, etc)
’able
to relate this particular example to problematic issues in the context of the
discipline’
|
Demonstrates awareness of the scope and scale of the
problem(s) within the given context (the company, corporation, etc)
|
Is able to identify/name the problem(s) and give
indications of the outcomes /implications that make it problematic.
|
Is able to identify/name the problem(s)
Possibly
also…’able to say why it is a problem in the context of the discipline’
|
Does not identify the problem(s) OR
identification is insufficient.
|
|
Analyse the problem
using the appropriate theoretical framework(s) of the discipline
|
Covers all aspects of the analysis, always trying to
drill down and give depth; uses all elements of the underpinning theoretical framework
relevant to the discipline.
|
Covers all aspects of the analysis, showing some depth
in places; uses all elements of the underpinning theoretical framework
relevant to the discipline.
|
Gives an overall analysis using main elements of the
underpinning theoretical framework relevant to the discipline.
|
Gives a partial analysis using main elements of the
underpinning theoretical framework relevant to the discipline.
|
Analysis demonstrates little or no
understanding of the underpinning theoretical framework relevant to the
discipline.
|
|
Explore the range of
methodologies; select and use the/those most appropriate
|
There is thorough exploration of the range
of available methodologies (in the discipline and/or other related
disciplines); justification for the selection and application is systematic
and detailed.
|
Explores the range of available methodologies (in the
discipline and/or other related disciplines); selection is justified and the
application is explained.
|
Identifies/names range of available methodologies (in
the discipline and/or other related disciplines); selects appropriately with
some justification for choice; main features of application are indicated.
|
Identifies/names some of the range of available
methodologies (in the discipline and/or other related disciplines); selects
appropriately though reasons for this are either absent or not fully
explained; some application is indicated.
|
The analysis does not consider a
range of methodologies OR the methodology selected and used is not the most
appropriate.
|
|
Provide solution(s)
and/or recommendation(s) that follow coherently from the research and
analysis carried out
|
Provides solutions and/or
recommendations, and choices are prioritised; links to foregoing research and
analysis are coherent and well integrated into the text and use of examples
to clearly bring the theory to practise.
|
Provides solutions and/or
recommendations, with some prioritisation of choice; there are coherent links
to foregoing research and analysis. Some basic use of examples to bring the
theory to practise.
|
Provides a range of solutions
and/or recommendations; links to foregoing research and analysis show some
coherence. Little use of examples to
bring the theory to practise.
|
Provides some solutions and/or
recommendations; there is some linking to the foregoing research and analysis No evidence of examples to practise
|
Demonstrates little or no
solution(s) and/or recommendation(s) OR the solution and/or recommendations
provided are not informed by research and analysis; significant limitations
apparent. No evidence to bring theory to practise.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment