Sunday, 2 March 2014

Confusion over terminology Give an example of terminology that could be confusing between a digital forensic expert, a lawyer, judge, and potential jurors

NEED THIS BY 3/5/14 / 8 AM EST PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS AS BELOW.PLEASE SEE ATTACH PDF DOC this document is VERY sensitive and needs to be done correctly. master level writing 6th edition APA style. Each posting must be at least 130 words long to receive any credit. Only the first two initial postings and the first two response postings meeting the 130-word requirement will be graded. Each of two initial postings must include at least two references – one internal (course readings, course modules, webliography) and one external (other authoritative sources beyond our course material). Note: No wiki or blog references. Each of the two response postings must include at least one reference, either internal or external.
**************** QUESTION # 1 Confusion over terminology Give an example of terminology that could be confusing between a digital forensic expert, a lawyer, judge, and potential jurors. In your opinion, how could this potential issue be reduced? Can we ever eliminate this issue? ************************************************ QUESTION#2 Presenting digital evidence Why is testifying and/or writing a report such a critical part of the computer forensics experts job? In your opinion, which one is more important -- testifying or writing a report?

No comments:

Post a Comment