Intro
to Philosophy Spring 2014 Exam 1 Study Questions
1. Briefly
explain either Descartes’ ontological argument for the existence of God, or St.
Anselm’s ontological argument for the existence of God. Why does Kant think
that employing any ontological argument to try to prove God’s existence is a
mistake?
2. Briefly
explain the Argument from Design for the existence of God, as set forth by
either William Paley or St. Thomas Aquinas. If evolutionary theory happens to
be true, and if all life-forms on this planet evolved to be what they are today
because they favored the particular genes that code for them, would the truth
of evolutionary theory then undermine the credibility of the Argument from
Design? Explain why or why not.
3. Many
Christians believe that faith in God should be based on free will, and not on
miracles. Suppose you are a Christian, and you were to encounter a pagan who
says this to you:
“Why shouldn’t faith be based on
miracles? After all, if you have a fancy sports car that has a twelve-cylinder
engine, it would be foolish not to test the horsepower of the engine by racing
the car as often as you can, so you can be sure you have the “real deal”; why
else would you have a sports car?
In the same way, if God is as
powerful as you say He is, wouldn’t it be foolish not to witness His power by
testing it for yourself and getting Him to perform a few miracles every now and
then, so you can be sure that you have the “real deal”; why else would you
believe in God as opposed to some pagan deity?”
How would you respond to the pagan?
4. Explain
what a monad is, according to Leibniz. Given the nature
of monads, how would Leibniz’s view of reality explain the apparent presence of
change in the world and the nature of space and time?
5. What
is substance, according to Aristotle? Explain how Aristotle utilizes the
notions of form and matter to explain change in the world.
6. How
does Descartes use the Insanity Argument, the Dreaming Argument, and the Evil
Genius Argument to systematically cast all his beliefs into doubt? How does he
then go on to argue that even if all of his beliefs are cast into doubt, one
thing must still remain certain? What is this one thing?
No comments:
Post a Comment